Aug
31
As someone who regularly stutters, stumbles, bumbles, and tumbles over trying to form words with her mouth, especially when in the presence of another human being, technology is the best thing that has ever happened to me. I'm infinitely better at writing than talking. This explains why people like my blog more than they like the actual me.
Need to tell someone off? Send them a Facebook message! Is that not soap boxy enough for you? Post it publicly to their wall! Cryptic diary entries are a thing of the past. Why spend all that time penning about your life's angst when you can just vaguely tweet about it? Are you looking for that perfect way to say "I care enough about you to remember that you exist, but not enough to actually talk to you"? There's this wonderful invention called the text message!
The world is sunshine and rainbows and gigabytes and pixels.
However, even if it is technological communication, it's still communication. People are still involved with communication. In this case, there are going to be some flaws.
The major drawback with talking electronically is that it's impersonal. After a while, there hardly feels like any difference between talking to your friends and talking to Cleverbot. It's all too easy to forget that there is a person on the other end, a live person with opinions and standards and feelings and stuff. As a result, we do things that would never ever fly in real life interaction.
Here are some things that I have observed exclusively in technological communication, and how they would translate in 3D socialization. (3D Socialization sounds like another really bad premise for a 3D movie.)
1. Instant messaging availability never means what you think it means.
IM clients have this handy little feature that allows you to be able to tell if a certain friend of yours is available to talk or not. In my head, this is how that should work:
Online: I'm rearing and ready to talk to!
Away: I'm away from my computer. I probably won't respond if you try to contact me. Because I'm away.
Busy: I'm preoccupied with something really important, like curing cancer or splitting an atom. Don't disturb me.
Offline: I'm in no way, shape, or form associated with my IM client right now.
This is what it actually means:
Online: I forgot to put myself in "away" mode.
Away: I forgot to put myself in "online" mode.
Busy: I don't have the balls to remove people that annoy me off of my buddy list, so I'm perpetually in "busy" mode, avoiding them.
Offline: I'm in invisible mode! I will instant message you as if I have been resurrected from the dead!
I'm petrified to instigate chat conversations because my friends expect me to be psychic or Hermione Granger or something.
Put in real-life perspective:
Your friend is sitting at a table. You walk over to them and greet them. Whenever you attempt to say anything to them, they respond, "I am away from this table right now."
2. Electronic goodbyes matter, too.
After studying quantum physics to find out that you and your friend are both online at the same time, you engage them in conversation. You know, conversation. That thing where you are both saying things to one another. After a questionable gap in this conversation, you look at your buddy list. That's when you notice.
They're no longer online.
Whatever happened to, "Hey. My person is going to leave the computer now. I just thought I'd let you know, so you don't wait up for my response that is never going to come or anything."? Even if there are lulls in conversation, or you both get distracted, it's still common courtesy. You say goodbye to that old high school friend you awkwardly engage in Wal*Mart even though you have nothing to talk about. This shouldn't be any different.
Put in real-life perspective:
You're talking to your friend. Suddenly, they get up and walk away from you, with no explanation whatsoever.
3. The many complexities of text messaging.
Actually, there's just one complexity: People suck at it.
The whole premise of texting is that you can carry all of your friendships in your pocket. Your friends can and will try to talk to you any day, at any time. There is rarely any urgency involved. You can reply to them at your utmost leisure. That's the blessing, as well as the curse.
You see, people are a bit too leisurely and not enough "utmost" when it comes to text messaging. People have busy lives. Or at least I assume that they do, because I'm between jobs and have the free time to be on top of my social life like some sort of ninja wizard. If it takes a couple hours to respond, that's okay. If it takes more than just a couple, that's also okay. That's about how long a work day is.
However, a full day? Multiple days? Never? What kind of person pours 10% of their earnings into a cell phone bill and then never checks it for messages?
The excuses are awesome, when you actually have the benefit of hearing them. "I'm so sorry I didn't respond to you! My phone was stolen by goblins, and I had thirteen hours to meander through this super complicated maze to get it back!" "Oh, really? That sounds an awful lot like Labyrinth." "...Yeah..."
Some situations are easy to explain. If you impale your friend with texts and they never respond, the truth is they probably don't like you. Other situations? Not so easy. There have been times when I've gotten a text from a friend, and I responded in a timely manner like a normal person. However, no response. Never a response. Was this person not holding their cell phone in their hands three minutes ago? The only scenario I can think of where that can actually happen is if they chuck their phone across a field, and then start sprinting in the opposite direction.
Put in real-life perspective:
You ask your friend a question, and they answer your question three days later. Either that your they talk to you next week, never acknowledging the fact that you asked them a question at all.
Yet, regardless of all of this, I would still deal with a confusing IM conversation over blundering through a two hour phone call.